Radeon RX 7800 XT vs R9 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 390
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
23.08

RX 7800 XT outperforms R9 390 by a whopping 170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking22326
Place by popularitynot in top-10095
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.4728.69
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 3
GPU code nameGrenadaNavi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 $579
Current price$20 (0.1x MSRP)$669 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 130% better value for money than R9 390.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603840
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0604.8
Floating-point performance5,120 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length275 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB16 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz19500 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Eyefinity1no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390 23.08
RX 7800 XT 62.30
+170%

RX 7800 XT outperforms R9 390 by 170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 390 8915
RX 7800 XT 24060
+170%

RX 7800 XT outperforms R9 390 by 170% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 390 12730
RX 7800 XT 49707
+290%

RX 7800 XT outperforms R9 390 by 290% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−177%
208
+177%
1440p45−50
−173%
123
+173%
4K27−30
−174%
74
+174%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−172%
258
+172%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−174%
178
+174%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−170%
100−110
+170%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−183%
190−200
+183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−185%
110−120
+185%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−176%
193
+176%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−183%
110−120
+183%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−175%
150−160
+175%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−178%
278
+178%
Hitman 3 40−45
−193%
110−120
+193%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−179%
474
+179%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−178%
130−140
+178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−203%
120−130
+203%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180−190
−171%
488
+171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−180%
196
+180%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−170%
162
+170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−170%
100−110
+170%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−183%
190−200
+183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−185%
110−120
+185%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−193%
161
+193%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−183%
110−120
+183%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−175%
150−160
+175%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−187%
200−210
+187%
Hitman 3 40−45
−193%
110−120
+193%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−176%
260−270
+176%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−170%
81
+170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−203%
120−130
+203%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
−184%
398
+184%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
−182%
366
+182%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−182%
120−130
+182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−189%
130
+189%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−170%
100−110
+170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−185%
110−120
+185%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−196%
148
+196%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−183%
110−120
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−178%
222
+178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
−174%
274
+174%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−183%
340
+183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−186%
200
+186%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−190%
145
+190%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−203%
120−130
+203%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−178%
130−140
+178%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−178%
130−140
+178%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−198%
119
+198%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−181%
75−80
+181%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−180%
95−100
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−177%
97
+177%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−193%
161
+193%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−189%
202
+189%
Hitman 3 30−33
−197%
85−90
+197%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−171%
217
+171%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−196%
148
+196%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
−170%
243
+170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−194%
147
+194%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−188%
115
+188%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−200%
100−110
+200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−170%
70−75
+170%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Hitman 3 18−20
−194%
50−55
+194%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−207%
90−95
+207%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−180%
84
+180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−195%
118
+195%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−197%
89
+197%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−188%
45−50
+188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−175%
44
+175%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−207%
40−45
+207%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−173%
164
+173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−191%
131
+191%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−180%
112
+180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−179%
67
+179%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−205%
60−65
+205%

This is how R9 390 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 177% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 173% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 174% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.08 62.30
Recency 18 June 2015 25 August 2023
Cost $329 $579
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 263 Watt

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 390 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 537 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2028 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.