Radeon R9 380X vs Quadro P5000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with Radeon R9 380X, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
31.80
+105%

P5000 outperforms R9 380X by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking170345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.747.89
Power efficiency12.585.82
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP104Antigua
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)19 November 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

R9 380X has 17% better value for money than Quadro P5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Compute unitsno data32
Core clock speed1607 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1733 MHz970 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate277.3124.2
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS3.973 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs160128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm221 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin​2 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data-
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz970 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s182.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+
Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.131+
Mantle-+
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5000 31.80
+105%
R9 380X 15.52

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5000 12626
+105%
R9 380X 6162

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
+118%
45−50
−118%
4K40
+122%
18−20
−122%

Cost per frame, $

1080p25.50
−401%
5.09
+401%
4K62.48
−391%
12.72
+391%
  • R9 380X has 401% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R9 380X has 391% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+109%
45−50
−109%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+119%
70−75
−119%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+105%
40−45
−105%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Valorant 130−140
+117%
60−65
−117%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+109%
45−50
−109%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Dota 2 100−110
+114%
50−55
−114%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%
Fortnite 150−160
+117%
70−75
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+119%
70−75
−119%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+114%
50−55
−114%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+105%
40−45
−105%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+106%
90−95
−106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+124%
50−55
−124%
Valorant 130−140
+117%
60−65
−117%
World of Tanks 270−280
+113%
130−140
−113%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+109%
45−50
−109%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Dota 2 100−110
+114%
50−55
−114%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+119%
70−75
−119%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+106%
90−95
−106%
Valorant 130−140
+117%
60−65
−117%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Dota 2 55−60
+119%
27−30
−119%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+119%
27−30
−119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+106%
85−90
−106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
World of Tanks 210−220
+111%
100−105
−111%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+108%
50−55
−108%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+128%
40−45
−128%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+109%
35−40
−109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+121%
24−27
−121%
Valorant 95−100
+113%
45−50
−113%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Dota 2 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+106%
50−55
−106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Dota 2 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Fortnite 40−45
+110%
21−24
−110%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+121%
24−27
−121%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Valorant 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%

This is how Quadro P5000 and R9 380X compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 118% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 122% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.80 15.52
Recency 1 October 2016 19 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 190 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 104.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 90% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 380X in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 380X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
AMD Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 182 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 187 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.