Quadro T1000 vs Quadro P500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P500 with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P500
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 18 Watt
4.22

T1000 outperforms P500 by a whopping 297% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking692335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.1823.10
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP108TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date5 January 2018 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed1455 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1518 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate24.29no data
Floating-point processing power0.7772 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1253 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P500 4.22
Quadro T1000 16.74
+297%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P500 1630
Quadro T1000 6473
+297%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P500 6245
Quadro T1000 33831
+442%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P500 6438
Quadro T1000 34236
+432%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−275%
75−80
+275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Far Cry 5 14
−293%
55−60
+293%
Fortnite 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Valorant 50−55
−289%
210−220
+289%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−294%
280−290
+294%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Dota 2 49
−288%
190−200
+288%
Far Cry 5 12
−275%
45−50
+275%
Fortnite 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−293%
55−60
+293%
Valorant 50−55
−289%
210−220
+289%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Dota 2 45
−278%
170−180
+278%
Far Cry 5 8
−275%
30−33
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−275%
30−33
+275%
Valorant 50−55
−289%
210−220
+289%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Valorant 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Valorant 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

This is how Quadro P500 and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 275% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.22 16.74
Recency 5 January 2018 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro P500 has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has a 296.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P500 is a mobile workstation card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P500
Quadro P500
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 30 votes

Rate Quadro P500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 438 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P500 or Quadro T1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.