Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs Quadro P4000

#ad 
Buy
P104-100 P104-101 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P6
VS
#ad 
Buy
Radeon RX Vega 2 Radeon RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 5 Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 9

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4000 with Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4000
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
25.91
+396%

P4000 outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 396% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking198598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.18no data
Power efficiency19.4927.49
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Vega Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)7 January 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$815 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792384
Core clock speed1202 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate165.8no data
Floating-point processing power5.304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1901 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
+240%
20
−240%
1440p110−120
+358%
24
−358%
4K85−90
+372%
18
−372%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.99no data
1440p7.41no data
4K9.59no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+321%
19
−321%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+212%
52
−212%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+377%
13
−377%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+433%
15
−433%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+386%
22
−386%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+376%
34
−376%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+520%
10
−520%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+513%
15
−513%
Fortnite 130−140
+300%
33
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+327%
24−27
−327%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+642%
12
−642%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+433%
21−24
−433%
Valorant 180−190
+87.6%
97
−87.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+789%
9
−789%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+410%
21
−410%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+1057%
14
−1057%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+382%
56
−382%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+786%
7
−786%
Dota 2 130−140
+212%
42
−212%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+475%
16
−475%
Fortnite 130−140
+500%
22
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+327%
24−27
−327%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+493%
14−16
−493%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
+567%
15
−567%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+700%
8
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+433%
21−24
−433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+381%
16
−381%
Valorant 180−190
+149%
73
−149%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+463%
19
−463%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+675%
8
−675%
Dota 2 130−140
+228%
40
−228%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+475%
16
−475%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+327%
24−27
−327%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+433%
21−24
−433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+273%
11
−273%
Valorant 180−190
+858%
19
−858%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+288%
30−35
−288%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+622%
9−10
−622%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+345%
40−45
−345%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+657%
7−8
−657%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+373%
35−40
−373%
Valorant 220−230
+351%
49
−351%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+863%
8−9
−863%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+500%
10−12
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+436%
14−16
−436%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+513%
8−9
−513%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+527%
10−12
−527%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+224%
16−18
−224%
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Valorant 160−170
+664%
22
−664%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1000%
4−5
−1000%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Dota 2 85−90
+368%
19
−368%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%

This is how Quadro P4000 and RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4000 is 240% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4000 is 358% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4000 is 372% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4000 is 2050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P4000 surpassed RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 25.91 5.22
Recency 6 February 2017 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro P4000 has a 396.4% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 is a workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
R9 M470 Radeon R9 M470
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000
RTX 3050 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 3050 Mobile
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000
RX 6600M AMD RX 6600M
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000
RX 6600 XT AMD RX 6600 XT
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000
RX 6600 AMD RX 6600
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000
A10 PCIe A10 PCIe
vs
Quadro P4000 P4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 314 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 716 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4000 or Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.