Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs Quadro P400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 P6000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9060 XT 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT 16GB 9070 9070 GRE 9070 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P400 with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P400
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.93

RX 9060 XT 16GB outperforms P400 by a whopping 1386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
RX 9060 XT 16GB RX 9060 XT 16GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking72240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Power efficiency9.93no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 4 (2025)
GPU code nameGP107no data
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)2 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed1228 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1252 MHz2530 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.03no data
Floating-point processing power0.641 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth32.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−1550%
165
+1550%
1440p5−6
−1400%
75
+1400%
4K3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.00no data
1440p24.00no data
4K40.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Sons of the Forest 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 270
+0%
270
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Sons of the Forest 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 248
+0%
248
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 154
+0%
154
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Sons of the Forest 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 273
+0%
273
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 233
+0%
233
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Sons of the Forest 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Sons of the Forest 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+0%
102
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+0%
91
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Sons of the Forest 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Quadro P400 and RX 9060 XT 16GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 1550% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 1400% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 1467% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.93 58.40
Recency 7 February 2017 2 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

RX 9060 XT 16GB has a 1386% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P400
Quadro P400
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P400 Quadro P400
vs
GRID M40 GRID M40
RX 9060 XT 16GB Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
vs
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
vs
FirePro W600 FirePro W600
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
Quadro 2000M Quadro 2000M
vs
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
GT 750M GeForce GT 750M
vs
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
vs
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
vs
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
Xbox One S GPU Xbox One S GPU
vs
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
GRID K280Q GRID K280Q
vs
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
Xbox Series X GPU Xbox Series X GPU
vs
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 521 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 58 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P400 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.