Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB vs Quadro P400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P400 with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P400
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.90

RX 9060 XT 16 GB outperforms P400 by a whopping 1151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking72670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.3771.38
Power efficiency9.9023.21
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 44
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)4 June 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.99 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 9060 XT 16 GB has 2912% better value for money than Quadro P400.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed1228 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1252 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate20.03400.6
Floating-point processing power0.641 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.06 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P400 3.90
RX 9060 XT 16 GB 48.78
+1151%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P400 1653
RX 9060 XT 16 GB 20665
+1150%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.90 48.78
Recency 7 February 2017 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 160 Watt

Quadro P400 has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 1150.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P400
Quadro P400
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 512 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 193 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P400 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.