GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs FirePro V4900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking879not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.44no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTurksTU106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)18 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480896
Core clock speed800 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1590 MHz
Number of transistors716 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2089.04
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS2.849 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2456
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data14
L1 Cache48 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length163 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 18 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 90 Watt

FirePro V4900 has 20% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 TU106, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V4900 and GeForce GTX 1650 TU106. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V4900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 155 votes

Rate FirePro V4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 303 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V4900 or GeForce GTX 1650 TU106, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.