CMP 50HX vs Quadro P3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking305not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.94no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923584
Core clock speed1328 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8296.6
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs112192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cache672 KB3.5 MB
L2 Cache1536 KB5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB10 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s560.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.17.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P3200 34395
CMP 50HX 55486
+61.3%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P3200 33620
CMP 50HX 47445
+41.1%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro P3200 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 66.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while CMP 50HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 338 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 64 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.