GeForce RTX 5090 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3000 Mobile with GeForce RTX 5090, including specs and performance data.

P3000 Mobile
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.50

RTX 5090 outperforms P3000 Mobile by a whopping 506% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3331
Place by popularitynot in top-10059
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.03
Power efficiency15.4512.21
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGP104GB202
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128021760
Core clock speed1088 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate97.201,637
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs48176
TMUs80680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount6 GB32 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA6.110.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P3000 Mobile 16.50
RTX 5090 100.00
+506%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6492
RTX 5090 39373
+506%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
−217%
203
+217%
1440p30−35
−520%
186
+520%
4K28
−429%
148
+429%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.85
1440pno data10.75
4Kno data13.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−512%
250−260
+512%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−638%
210−220
+638%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−630%
240−250
+630%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−512%
250−260
+512%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−190%
190−200
+190%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−638%
210−220
+638%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−630%
240−250
+630%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−302%
210−220
+302%
Fortnite 85−90
−243%
300−350
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−421%
300−350
+421%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−484%
250−260
+484%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−205%
170−180
+205%
Valorant 120−130
−435%
650−700
+435%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−512%
250−260
+512%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−190%
190−200
+190%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−638%
210−220
+638%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−35%
270−280
+35%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−630%
240−250
+630%
Dota 2 95−100
−467%
550−600
+467%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−302%
210−220
+302%
Fortnite 85−90
−243%
300−350
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−421%
300−350
+421%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−484%
250−260
+484%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
−190%
170−180
+190%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−109%
69
+109%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−205%
170−180
+205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−595%
400−450
+595%
Valorant 120−130
−435%
650−700
+435%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−190%
190−200
+190%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−597%
202
+597%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−630%
240−250
+630%
Dota 2 95−100
−467%
550−600
+467%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−302%
210−220
+302%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−421%
300−350
+421%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−505%
260−270
+505%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−205%
170−180
+205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−961%
350
+961%
Valorant 120−130
−435%
650−700
+435%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
−243%
300−350
+243%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−917%
183
+917%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−341%
500−550
+341%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−550%
160−170
+550%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−910%
202
+910%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−12.2%
170−180
+12.2%
Valorant 150−160
−205%
450−500
+205%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−336%
190−200
+336%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1021%
150−160
+1021%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−491%
200−210
+491%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−685%
300−350
+685%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−486%
170−180
+486%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−1184%
321
+1184%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−331%
150−160
+331%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−885%
128
+885%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2386%
174
+2386%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−545%
180−190
+545%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1292%
167
+1292%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−1618%
378
+1618%
Valorant 85−90
−277%
300−350
+277%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−686%
55
+686%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1217%
75−80
+1217%
Dota 2 55−60
−436%
300−310
+436%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−900%
170−180
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−989%
300−350
+989%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−540%
95−100
+540%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−394%
75−80
+394%

This is how P3000 Mobile and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is 217% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 is 520% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 is 429% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5090 is 2386% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 5090 surpassed P3000 Mobile in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.50 100.00
Recency 11 January 2017 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 575 Watt

P3000 Mobile has 666.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 506.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 163 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1942 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3000 Mobile or GeForce RTX 5090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.