GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs Quadro P2000

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Quadro P2000
18.75

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 151% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking27563
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money14.1546.40
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP106Turing TU104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years old)2 July 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 $499
Current price$371 (0.6x MSRP)$261 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super has 228% better value for money than Quadro P2000.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1076 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt215 Watt
Texture fill rate94.72283.2
Floating-point performance3,031 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length201 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB8 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.75
RTX 2070 Super 47.07
+151%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 151% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P2000 7268
RTX 2070 Super 18244
+151%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 151% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P2000 32964
RTX 2070 Super 89209
+171%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 171% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P2000 8387
RTX 2070 Super 35032
+318%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 318% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P2000 6847
RTX 2070 Super 24639
+260%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 260% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P2000 43566
RTX 2070 Super 129295
+197%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 197% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P2000 22538
RTX 2070 Super 100123
+344%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 344% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Quadro P2000 350317
RTX 2070 Super 515887
+47.3%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 47% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P2000 24052
RTX 2070 Super 98067
+308%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 308% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P2000 21668
RTX 2070 Super 107983
+398%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro P2000 by 398% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−137%
135
+137%
1440p20
−320%
84
+320%
4K16
−244%
55
+244%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−213%
94
+213%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−167%
104
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−175%
88
+175%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−87.3%
118
+87.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−275%
180
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−180%
84
+180%
Far Cry 5 47
−162%
123
+162%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−120%
112
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−168%
174
+168%
Hitman 3 50−55
−226%
176
+226%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−178%
111
+178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−277%
117
+277%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−228%
131
+228%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−208%
111
+208%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−131%
90
+131%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−131%
74
+131%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−63.5%
103
+63.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−190%
139
+190%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−160%
78
+160%
Far Cry 5 41
−185%
117
+185%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−110%
107
+110%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−165%
172
+165%
Hitman 3 50−55
−185%
154
+185%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−118%
87
+118%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−200%
90
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−116%
67
+116%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−208%
123
+208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
−376%
181
+376%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−167%
96
+167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−66.7%
65
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−106%
66
+106%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−50.8%
95
+50.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−143%
73
+143%
Far Cry 5 35
−214%
110
+214%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−92.2%
98
+92.2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−135%
153
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−300%
100
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−88.9%
68
+88.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−239%
95
+239%
Hitman 3 30−33
−237%
101
+237%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−152%
63
+152%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−217%
57
+217%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−214%
44
+214%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−258%
86
+258%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−185%
57
+185%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−212%
53
+212%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−102%
83
+102%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−327%
47
+327%
Far Cry 5 21
−367%
98
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−153%
91
+153%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−229%
125
+229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−270%
70−75
+270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−292%
51
+292%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−293%
55
+293%
Hitman 3 16−18
−224%
55
+224%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−58.3%
19
+58.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−270%
37
+270%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−180%
28
+180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−283%
46
+283%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−423%
68
+423%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−255%
39
+255%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−256%
32
+256%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−152%
53
+152%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−475%
23
+475%
Far Cry 5 9
−500%
54
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−217%
57
+217%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−223%
84
+223%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−263%
29
+263%

This is how Quadro P2000 and RTX 2070 Super compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 137% faster than Quadro P2000

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 320% faster than Quadro P2000

4K resolution:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 244% faster than Quadro P2000

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super is 500% faster than the Quadro P2000.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2070 Super surpassed Quadro P2000 in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 18.75 47.07
Recency 6 February 2017 2 July 2019
Cost $585 $499
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 215 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 538 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4325 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.