GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB vs Quadro P2000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5
18.78
+23.4%

Quadro P2000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking279324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.995.52
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP106N17P-G1 Max-Q
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)30 May 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data
Current price$371 (0.6x MSRP)$1010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P2000 has 153% better value for money than GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241280
Core clock speed1076 MHz1063 - 1265 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1341 - 1480 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 - 70 Watt
Texture fill rate94.72118.4
Floating-point performance3,031 gflops3,789 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P2000 and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount5 GB6.144 MB
Memory bus width160 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan++
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.78
+23.4%
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 15.22

Quadro P2000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P2000 8387
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 13334
+59%

GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB outperforms Quadro P2000 by 59% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P2000 6847
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 10430
+52.3%

GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB outperforms Quadro P2000 by 52% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P2000 43566
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 74101
+70.1%

GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB outperforms Quadro P2000 by 70% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Quadro P2000 350317
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 367999
+5%

GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB outperforms Quadro P2000 by 5% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−43.9%
82
+43.9%
1440p20
+25%
16−18
−25%
4K16
−75%
28
+75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+21.9%
30−35
−21.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+21.2%
50−55
−21.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+23.1%
35−40
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 47
−48.9%
70
+48.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+24.4%
40−45
−24.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+22.6%
50−55
−22.6%
Hitman 3 50−55
+28.6%
40−45
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+25%
30−35
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+25%
30−35
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+21.9%
30−35
−21.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+21.2%
50−55
−21.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+23.1%
35−40
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 41
−58.5%
65
+58.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+24.4%
40−45
−24.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+22.6%
50−55
−22.6%
Hitman 3 50−55
+28.6%
40−45
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+25%
30−35
−25%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+25%
30−35
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
−73.7%
66
+73.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+21.9%
30−35
−21.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+21.2%
50−55
−21.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 35
−37.1%
48
+37.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+24.4%
40−45
−24.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+22.6%
50−55
−22.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−40%
35
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Hitman 3 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 21
−19%
24−27
+19%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−84.6%
24
+84.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 9
−122%
20
+122%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how Quadro P2000 and GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 43.9% faster than Quadro P2000 in 1080p
  • Quadro P2000 is 25% faster than GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB in 1440p
  • GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 75% faster than Quadro P2000 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P2000 is 44.4% faster than the GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 122% faster than the Quadro P2000.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is ahead in 60 tests (88%)
  • GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is ahead in 8 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.78 15.22
Recency 6 February 2017 30 May 2017
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 6.144 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt

The Quadro P2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 544 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 183 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.