M5000M vs P2000 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

P2000 Mobile
16.88

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 6% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking297284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.377.41
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameGP107GLGM204
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date5 July 2017 (6 years old)2 October 2015 (8 years old)
Current price$1477 $468
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M5000M has 120% better value for money than P2000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681,536
Core clock speed1215 MHz962 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1051 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate77.1493.60
Floating-point performanceno data2,995 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P2000 Mobile and Quadro M5000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA6.15.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Mobile 16.88
M5000M 17.88
+5.9%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 6% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

P2000 Mobile 8387
M5000M 11845
+41.2%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 41% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

P2000 Mobile 6847
M5000M 9228
+34.8%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 35% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

P2000 Mobile 43566
M5000M 63738
+46.3%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 46% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

P2000 Mobile 350317
+8.1%
M5000M 324161

P2000 Mobile outperforms M5000M by 8% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P2000 Mobile 60
M5000M 71
+19.2%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 19% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P2000 Mobile 104
+0.9%
M5000M 103

P2000 Mobile outperforms M5000M by 1% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P2000 Mobile 67
M5000M 88
+31.2%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 31% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P2000 Mobile 70
M5000M 97
+37.7%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 38% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P2000 Mobile 65
M5000M 82
+25.5%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 25% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P2000 Mobile 23
M5000M 32
+40%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 40% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P2000 Mobile 31
M5000M 44
+44.1%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 44% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P2000 Mobile 5
M5000M 7
+31.5%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 31% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P2000 Mobile 31
M5000M 44
+44.1%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 44% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P2000 Mobile 60
M5000M 71
+19.4%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 19% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P2000 Mobile 70
M5000M 97
+37.7%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 38% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P2000 Mobile 104
+0.9%
M5000M 103

P2000 Mobile outperforms M5000M by 1% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P2000 Mobile 67
M5000M 87
+31%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 31% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P2000 Mobile 65
M5000M 82
+25.5%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 25% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P2000 Mobile 23
M5000M 32
+40%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 40% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P2000 Mobile 5.4
M5000M 7.1
+31.5%

M5000M outperforms P2000 Mobile by 31% in SPECviewperf 12 - Energy.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−12%
84
+12%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 16.88 17.88
Recency 5 July 2017 2 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 Mobile and Quadro M5000M. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 78 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 126 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.