Quadro K4200 vs P2000 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	351	388
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.26	4.39
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GP107GL	GK104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	5 July 2017 (6 years ago)	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$854.99
Current price	$426	$311 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P2000 Max-Q has 88% better value for money than Quadro K4200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1344
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	771 MHz
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz	784 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	108 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	87.81
Floating-point performance	no data	2,107 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Quadro K4200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	172.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	+
CUDA	no data	3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Max-Q 13.79
+23.6%

Quadro K4200 11.16

P2000 Max-Q outperforms K4200 by 24% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

P2000 Max-Q 5337
+23.6%

Quadro K4200 4319

P2000 Max-Q outperforms K4200 by 24% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50 +25%	40−45 −25%
4K	20 +25%	16−18 −25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24
+31.3%

16−18

−31.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +26.7%	30−33 −26.7%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +40%	35−40 −40%
Hitman 3	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +26.7%	30−33 −26.7%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +40%	35−40 −40%
Hitman 3	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +26.7%	30−33 −26.7%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +40%	35−40 −40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Hitman 3	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Hitman 3	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3 +50%	2−3 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%