GeForce4 MX 440 vs Quadro NVS 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1184not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG8x (2007−2008)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG84MNV17 A3
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date9 June 2007 (17 years ago)6 February 2002 (22 years ago)
Current price$66 $30

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed575 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors289 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.2001.100
Floating-point performance73.6 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro NVS 320M and GeForce4 MX 440 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, GDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

NVS 320M 208
+5100%
GeForce4 MX 440 4

Quadro NVS 320M outperforms GeForce4 MX 440 by 5100% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 June 2007 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 150 nm

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 320M and GeForce4 MX 440. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce4 MX 440 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Quadro NVS 320M
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce4 MX 440

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 233 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.