GeForce 7000M vs Go 7900 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7900 GS and GeForce 7000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7900 GS
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 20 Watt
0.42
+1300%

7900 GS outperforms 7000M by a whopping 1300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13101548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.61no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameG71C67
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2006 (19 years ago)1 February 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores273
Core clock speed375 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.500no data
ROPs16no data
TMUs20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3shared Memory
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)shared Memory
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7900 GS 0.42
+1300%
GeForce 7000M 0.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7900 GS 177
+1262%
Samples: 58
GeForce 7000M 13
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Go 7900 GS is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Go 7900 GS performs better in 17 tests (81%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (19%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.03
Recency 18 April 2006 1 February 2006

Go 7900 GS has a 1300% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The GeForce Go 7900 GS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS
GeForce Go 7900 GS
NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
GeForce 7000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GS or GeForce 7000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.