GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3000 SE M4000 M5000 M5000 SE M6000 M6000 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1630 1650 1650 GDDR6 1650 SUPER 1650 TU106 1650 TU116 1660 1660 Super 1660 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 24 GB with GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

M6000 24 GB
2016, $4,999
24 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
27.67
+14.2%

M6000 24 GB outperforms 1650 SUPER by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
M6000 24 GB M6000 24 GB
GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1650 SUPER

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking233258
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.15no data
Power efficiency8.5418.69
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM200TU116
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 March 2016 (9 years ago)22 November 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721280
Core clock speed988 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate285.2138.0
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS4.416 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs25680
L1 Cache1.1 MB1.3 MB
L2 Cache3 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.27.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

M6000 24 GB 27.67
+14.2%
GTX 1650 SUPER 24.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M6000 24 GB 11625
+14.1%
Samples: 120
GTX 1650 SUPER 10185
Samples: 6362

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+10.3%
68
−10.3%
1440p35−40
+0%
35
+0%
4K21−24
+0%
21
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p66.65no data
1440p142.83no data
4K238.05no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 248
+0%
248
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 201
+0%
201
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Dota 2 209
+0%
209
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+0%
103
+0%
Metro Exodus 51
+0%
51
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+0%
90
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 191
+0%
191
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 29
+0%
29
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+0%
20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+0%
32
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+0%
3
+0%
Dota 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how M6000 24 GB and GTX 1650 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • M6000 24 GB is 10% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 27.67 24.24
Recency 5 March 2016 22 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

M6000 24 GB has a 14.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 SUPER, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M6000 24 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 24 GB is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
vs
Instinct MI60 Radeon Instinct MI60
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
vs
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
Quadro M2000 M2000
vs
Pro Vega 64X Pro Vega 64X
Quadro M2000 M2000
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 GTX 1650 GDDR6
Quadro M2000 M2000
vs
RX 6900 XT RX 6900 XT
Quadro M2000 M2000
vs
Playstation 4 Slim GPU Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Quadro M2000 M2000
vs
RX 9060 XT 16 GB RX 9060 XT 16 GB
M6000 24 GB M6000 24 GB
vs
RX 6900 XT RX 6900 XT
M6000 24 GB M6000 24 GB
vs
Instinct MI300 Instinct MI300
Tesla M4 Tesla M4
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Tesla M4 Tesla M4
vs
Vega 8 Efficient Vega 8 Efficient
Tesla M4 Tesla M4
vs
RX 5900 XT RX 5900 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 19 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5353 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 24 GB or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.