Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Quadro M5500
Aggregated performance score
Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms Quadro M5500 by a whopping 203% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 254 | 25 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.76 | 28.16 |
Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2018) | RDNA 3 |
GPU code name | GM204 | Navi 32 |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 4 April 2016 (8 years ago) | 25 August 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $579 |
Current price | $1700 | $669 (1.2x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RX 7800 XT has 920% better value for money than Quadro M5500.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 3840 |
Core clock speed | 1139 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1140 MHz | 2430 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5200 Million | 28,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 263 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 149.1 | 604.8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Quadro M5500 and Radeon RX 7800 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 267 mm |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
SLI options | + | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6606 MHz | 19500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 576.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |
HDMI | no data | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | no data |
G-SYNC support | + | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro | + | no data |
Mosaic | + | no data |
VR Ready | + | no data |
nView Display Management | + | no data |
Optimus | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.7 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.2 |
Vulkan | + | 1.3 |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms Quadro M5500 by 203% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms Quadro M5500 by 203% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 70−75
−206%
| 214
+206%
|
1440p | 40−45
−215%
| 126
+215%
|
4K | 24−27
−217%
| 76
+217%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−682%
|
258
+682%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
−137%
|
95−100
+137%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40
−200%
|
100−110
+200%
|
Battlefield 5 | 65−70
−119%
|
140−150
+119%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55
−206%
|
160−170
+206%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−485%
|
193
+485%
|
Far Cry 5 | 50−55
−237%
|
182
+237%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
−182%
|
155
+182%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−149%
|
170−180
+149%
|
Hitman 3 | 55−60
−225%
|
190−200
+225%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
−214%
|
130−140
+214%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
−209%
|
100−110
+209%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
−514%
|
270
+514%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−172%
|
100−110
+172%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
−137%
|
95−100
+137%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40
−200%
|
100−110
+200%
|
Battlefield 5 | 65−70
−119%
|
140−150
+119%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55
−206%
|
160−170
+206%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−388%
|
161
+388%
|
Far Cry 5 | 50−55
−224%
|
175
+224%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
−175%
|
151
+175%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−149%
|
170−180
+149%
|
Hitman 3 | 55−60
−225%
|
190−200
+225%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
−214%
|
130−140
+214%
|
Metro Exodus | 30−35
−397%
|
164
+397%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
−209%
|
100−110
+209%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
−436%
|
236
+436%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
−676%
|
349
+676%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−172%
|
100−110
+172%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
−137%
|
95−100
+137%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40
−200%
|
100−110
+200%
|
Battlefield 5 | 65−70
−119%
|
140−150
+119%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−348%
|
148
+348%
|
Far Cry 5 | 50−55
−200%
|
162
+200%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
−147%
|
136
+147%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−149%
|
170−180
+149%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
−322%
|
190
+322%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−172%
|
100−110
+172%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 30−35
−258%
|
110−120
+258%
|
Hitman 3 | 30−35
−300%
|
130−140
+300%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
−270%
|
100−105
+270%
|
Metro Exodus | 20−22
−415%
|
103
+415%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
−273%
|
55−60
+273%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27
−508%
|
158
+508%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
−209%
|
65−70
+209%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−295%
|
75−80
+295%
|
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
−162%
|
110−120
+162%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−708%
|
97
+708%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−374%
|
161
+374%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
−244%
|
134
+244%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−241%
|
140−150
+241%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
−509%
|
140
+509%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16
−357%
|
60−65
+357%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
−347%
|
65−70
+347%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
−289%
|
70−75
+289%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−385%
|
60−65
+385%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
−458%
|
67
+458%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−236%
|
35−40
+236%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
−493%
|
83
+493%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
−438%
|
113
+438%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
−262%
|
45−50
+262%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−12
−318%
|
45−50
+318%
|
Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−225%
|
75−80
+225%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1000%
|
44
+1000%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
−506%
|
103
+506%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 20−22
−445%
|
109
+445%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−234%
|
95−100
+234%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10
−311%
|
35−40
+311%
|
This is how Quadro M5500 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:
- RX 7800 XT is 206% faster in 1080p
- RX 7800 XT is 215% faster in 1440p
- RX 7800 XT is 217% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 1000% faster than the Quadro M5500.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 7800 XT surpassed Quadro M5500 in all 68 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 20.45 | 61.97 |
Recency | 4 April 2016 | 25 August 2023 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 263 Watt |
The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M5500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro M5500 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.