Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Quadro M520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M520 with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M520
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 25 Watt
4.52

AI PRO R9700 outperforms M520 by a whopping 1475% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking68318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.7918.10
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGM108Navi 48
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed1041 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1019 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate16.66747.5
Floating-point processing power0.7995 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth40 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M520 4.52
AI PRO R9700 71.19
+1475%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M520 1896
AI PRO R9700 29830
+1473%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−1400%
300−350
+1400%
4K12
−1400%
180−190
+1400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
God of War 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−1426%
290−300
+1426%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1471%
220−230
+1471%
Fortnite 27−30
−1381%
400−450
+1381%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−1400%
180−190
+1400%
God of War 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1456%
280−290
+1456%
Valorant 55−60
−1452%
900−950
+1452%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−1426%
290−300
+1426%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
−1463%
1250−1300
+1463%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Dota 2 40−45
−1400%
600−650
+1400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1471%
220−230
+1471%
Fortnite 27−30
−1381%
400−450
+1381%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−1400%
180−190
+1400%
God of War 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1433%
230−240
+1433%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1456%
280−290
+1456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1438%
200−210
+1438%
Valorant 55−60
−1452%
900−950
+1452%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−1426%
290−300
+1426%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Dota 2 40−45
−1400%
600−650
+1400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1471%
220−230
+1471%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
God of War 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1456%
280−290
+1456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1438%
200−210
+1438%
Valorant 55−60
−1452%
900−950
+1452%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−1381%
400−450
+1381%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−1471%
550−600
+1471%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−1371%
500−550
+1371%
Valorant 50−55
−1400%
750−800
+1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1400%
120−130
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%
God of War 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1429%
260−270
+1429%
Valorant 21−24
−1422%
350−400
+1422%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 14−16
−1433%
230−240
+1433%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
God of War 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%

This is how Quadro M520 and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 1400% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 1400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.52 71.19
Recency 11 January 2017 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro M520 has 1100% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 1475% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M520 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M520
Quadro M520
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 32 votes

Rate Quadro M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M520 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.