Arc B580 vs Quadro M5000M

Place in the ranking	314	107
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	93.02
Power efficiency	12.54	14.63
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Xe2 (2025)
GPU code name	GM204	BMG-G21
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)	16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1,536	2560
Core clock speed	975 MHz	2670 MHz
Boost clock speed	1051 MHz	2670 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	93.60	427.2
Floating-point processing power	2.995 TFLOPS	13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	80
TMUs	96	160
Tensor Cores	no data	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.4
CUDA	5.2	-
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

M5000M 17.62

Arc B580 39.05
+122%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M5000M 6995

Arc B580 15505
+122%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	86 −45.3%	125 +45.3%
1440p	30−35 −133%	70 +133%
4K	18−20 −133%	42 +133%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.99
1440p	no data	3.56
4K	no data	5.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −347%	143 +347%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −108%	75−80 +108%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −82.8%	100−110 +82.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −266%	117 +266%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −108%	75−80 +108%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −111%	160−170 +111%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −115%	100−110 +115%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −95.9%	95−100 +95.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −81.4%	75−80 +81.4%
Valorant	70−75 −118%	160−170 +118%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −82.8%	100−110 +82.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −225%	104 +225%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −108%	75−80 +108%
Dota 2	65−70 −115%	140 +115%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −11.3%	69 +11.3%
Fortnite	95−100 −77.6%	170−180 +77.6%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −111%	160−170 +111%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −115%	100−110 +115%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −119%	140−150 +119%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +36.1%	36 −36.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −61.6%	200−210 +61.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −81.4%	75−80 +81.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −153%	140−150 +153%
Valorant	70−75 −118%	160−170 +118%
World of Tanks	210−220 −27.4%	270−280 +27.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −82.8%	100−110 +82.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −197%	95 +197%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −108%	75−80 +108%
Dota 2	65−70 −115%	140−150 +115%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −59.7%	95−100 +59.7%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −111%	160−170 +111%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −115%	100−110 +115%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −61.6%	200−210 +61.6%
Valorant	70−75 −118%	160−170 +118%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −23.8%	24−27 +23.8%
Dota 2	27−30 −146%	69 +146%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −107%	60−65 +107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −110%	350−400 +110%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%
World of Tanks	120−130 −105%	250−260 +105%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −100%	70−75 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −177%	130−140 +177%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −117%	100−105 +117%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 −131%	65−70 +131%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −112%	85−90 +112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Valorant	45−50 −178%	120−130 +178%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Dota 2	30−35 −152%	78 +152%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −110%	65−70 +110%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −254%	46 +254%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −143%	130−140 +143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −117%	24−27 +117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −110%	65−70 +110%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −161%	45−50 +161%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −75%	14 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Dota 2	30−35 −110%	65−70 +110%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −161%	60−65 +161%
Fortnite	21−24 −176%	55−60 +176%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −104%	55−60 +104%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −171%	35−40 +171%
Valorant	21−24 −224%	65−70 +224%

This is how M5000M and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

Arc B580 is 45% faster in 1080p
Arc B580 is 133% faster in 1440p
Arc B580 is 133% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the M5000M is 36% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc B580 is 347% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

M5000M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Arc B580 is ahead in 44 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.62	39.05
Recency	18 August 2015	16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	190 Watt

M5000M has 90% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 121.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000M is a mobile workstation card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.