Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Quadro M5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000 with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5000
2015
8 GB 256-bit, 150 Watt
24.37

RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M5000 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking208173
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.58no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)RDNA 3
GPU code nameGM204Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,856.99 no data
Current price$823 (0.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed861 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1038 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt120 Watt (75 - 120 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate132.9320.0
Floating-point performance4,252 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M5000 and Radeon RX 7600M XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6612 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 211 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin StereoPortable Device Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model56.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M5000 24.37
RX 7600M XT 29.86
+22.5%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M5000 by 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M5000 9412
RX 7600M XT 11530
+22.5%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M5000 by 23% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
−23.3%
111
+23.3%
1440p45−50
−33.3%
60
+33.3%
4K24−27
−33.3%
32
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
−25%
125
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110−120
−30%
143
+30%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−29.3%
95−100
+29.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−35.6%
60−65
+35.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−23.6%
65−70
+23.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−26.7%
75−80
+26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−24.7%
237
+24.7%
Hitman 3 45−50
−35.6%
60−65
+35.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−23%
246
+23%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−30.9%
144
+30.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−28.3%
75−80
+28.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200−210
−27%
254
+27%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−23.6%
136
+23.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
−26.7%
114
+26.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−28.9%
116
+28.9%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−29.3%
95−100
+29.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−35.6%
60−65
+35.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−23.6%
65−70
+23.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−26.7%
75−80
+26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−24%
120−130
+24%
Hitman 3 45−50
−35.6%
60−65
+35.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−25.3%
110−120
+25.3%
Metro Exodus 95−100
−28.4%
122
+28.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−28.3%
75−80
+28.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
−27.5%
204
+27.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−22.9%
172
+22.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−23.1%
80−85
+23.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−31.7%
79
+31.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
−24%
93
+24%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−35.6%
60−65
+35.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−23.6%
65−70
+23.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−24.3%
174
+24.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
−34%
134
+34%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
−26.4%
177
+26.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−23.8%
99
+23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−40%
49
+40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−28.3%
75−80
+28.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−26.7%
55−60
+26.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−105
−24%
124
+24%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−33.3%
60
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
−34%
67
+34%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−26.3%
101
+26.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−25.5%
138
+25.5%
Hitman 3 30−33
−23.3%
35−40
+23.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−27.5%
102
+27.5%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−30%
91
+30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
−25.3%
119
+25.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−30.9%
72
+30.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−25.9%
34
+25.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−27.5%
50−55
+27.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Hitman 3 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−33.3%
35−40
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−37.5%
33
+37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−30%
52
+30%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−38.1%
29
+38.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−38.1%
29
+38.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−27.1%
89
+27.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−33.3%
60
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−24.4%
56
+24.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−41.7%
17
+41.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−23.8%
24−27
+23.8%

This is how Quadro M5000 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 23% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 33% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.37 29.86
Recency 29 June 2015 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 120 Watt

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 60 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.