HD Graphics 2500 vs Quadro M5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000 with HD Graphics 2500, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5000
2015
8 GB 256-bit, 150 Watt
24.37
+3484%

Quadro M5000 outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 3484% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking2081137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.56no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)
GPU code nameGM204Ivy Bridge GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,856.99 no data
Current price$823 (0.3x MSRP)$521

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M5000 and HD Graphics 2500 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486
Core clock speed861 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate132.96.900
Floating-point performance4,252 gflops13.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M5000 and HD Graphics 2500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256 BitSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed6612 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidthUp to 211 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin StereoNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.1 (11_0)
Shader Model55.0
OpenGL4.54.0
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.80
CUDA5.2no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD250−260
+3471%
7
−3471%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1

This is how Quadro M5000 and HD Graphics 2500 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M5000 is 3471% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.37 0.68
Recency 29 June 2015 1 April 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm

The Quadro M5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 2500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 59 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1185 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.