GRID M60-8Q vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 with GRID M60-8Q, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.64

M60-8Q outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 1352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1250513
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.18
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2012 (14 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed650 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1178 MHz
Number of transistors392 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown225 Watt
Texture fill rate6.900150.8
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs6128
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.801.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−1275%
110−120
+1275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Valorant 27−30
−1329%
400−450
+1329%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12
−1317%
170−180
+1317%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 12−14
−1317%
170−180
+1317%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Valorant 27−30
−1329%
400−450
+1329%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 12−14
−1317%
170−180
+1317%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Valorant 27−30
−1329%
400−450
+1329%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1329%
200−210
+1329%
Valorant 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and GRID M60-8Q compete in popular games:

  • GRID M60-8Q is 1275% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 9.29
Recency 1 April 2012 30 August 2015
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics 2500 has a 27% more advanced lithography process.

GRID M60-8Q, on the other hand, has a 1352% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The GRID M60-8Q is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a desktop graphics card while GRID M60-8Q is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1616 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M60-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2500 or GRID M60-8Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.