Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Quadro M4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000M with Radeon RX 7650 GRE, including specs and performance data.

M4000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
15.44

RX 7650 GRE outperforms M4000M by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking373108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data84.92
Power efficiency11.0118.45
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGM204Navi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,2802048
Core clock speed975 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed1013 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate78.00345.0
Floating-point processing power2.496 TFLOPS22.08 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs80128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

M4000M 15.44
RX 7650 GRE 42.71
+177%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M4000M 6144
RX 7650 GRE 16992
+177%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
−170%
170−180
+170%
4K20
−175%
55−60
+175%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.64
4Kno data5.07

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−174%
230−240
+174%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
Dead Island 2 55−60
−176%
160−170
+176%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−166%
170−180
+166%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−174%
230−240
+174%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
Dead Island 2 55−60
−176%
160−170
+176%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Fortnite 80−85
−174%
230−240
+174%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−170%
170−180
+170%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−173%
150−160
+173%
Valorant 120−130
−146%
300−310
+146%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−166%
170−180
+166%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−174%
230−240
+174%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−176%
550−600
+176%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
Dead Island 2 55−60
−176%
160−170
+176%
Dota 2 90−95
−177%
260−270
+177%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Fortnite 80−85
−174%
230−240
+174%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−170%
170−180
+170%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−163%
150−160
+163%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−173%
150−160
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Valorant 120−130
−146%
300−310
+146%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−166%
170−180
+166%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
Dead Island 2 55−60
−176%
160−170
+176%
Dota 2 90−95
−177%
260−270
+177%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−170%
170−180
+170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−173%
150−160
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Valorant 120−130
−146%
300−310
+146%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
−174%
230−240
+174%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−170%
300−310
+170%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−150%
350−400
+150%
Valorant 150−160
−161%
400−450
+161%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Dead Island 2 24−27
−169%
70−75
+169%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−173%
90−95
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−173%
90−95
+173%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Dead Island 2 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−159%
70−75
+159%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Valorant 80−85
−168%
220−230
+168%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Dead Island 2 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Dota 2 50−55
−164%
140−150
+164%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−169%
70−75
+169%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

This is how M4000M and RX 7650 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7650 GRE is 170% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7650 GRE is 175% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.44 42.71
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 165 Watt

M4000M has 65% lower power consumption.

RX 7650 GRE, on the other hand, has a 176.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 147 votes

Rate Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M4000M or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.