Radeon RX 460 vs Quadro M4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000M with Radeon RX 460, including specs and performance data.

M4000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
16.08
+51.4%

M4000M outperforms RX 460 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking311400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.641.19
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameGM204Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years ago)8 August 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86
Current price$832 $397 (4.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M4000M has 206% better value for money than RX 460.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,280896
Core clock speed975 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speed1013 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate78.0067.20
Floating-point performance2,496 gflops2,150 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000M and Radeon RX 460 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSyncno data+
Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M4000M 16.08
+51.4%
RX 460 10.62

Quadro M4000M outperforms Radeon RX 460 by 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M4000M 6210
+51.4%
RX 460 4102

Quadro M4000M outperforms Radeon RX 460 by 51% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M4000M 10259
+19.3%
RX 460 8597

Quadro M4000M outperforms Radeon RX 460 by 19% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M4000M 7723
+35.5%
RX 460 5701

Quadro M4000M outperforms Radeon RX 460 by 35% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M4000M 49204
+41%
RX 460 34892

Quadro M4000M outperforms Radeon RX 460 by 41% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
+23.8%
42
−23.8%
1440p120−130
+44.6%
83
−44.6%
4K30−35
+50%
20
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

This is how M4000M and RX 460 compete in popular games:

  • M4000M is 24% faster in 1080p
  • M4000M is 45% faster in 1440p
  • M4000M is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.08 10.62
Recency 2 October 2015 8 August 2016
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

The Quadro M4000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 460 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 460 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 125 votes

Rate Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 912 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.