RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Quadro M4000M

Place in the ranking	340	76
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	84.74
Power efficiency	11.02	44.70
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GM204	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1,280	2816
Core clock speed	975 MHz	1620 MHz
Boost clock speed	1013 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	78.00	187.4
Floating-point processing power	2.496 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	80	88
Tensor Cores	no data	88
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.2	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M4000M 15.97

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.35
+184%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M4000M 6142

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17435
+184%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

M4000M 19918

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 86172
+333%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

M4000M 21133

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 81859
+287%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	75 −180%	210−220 +180%
4K	20 −175%	55−60 +175%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.09
4K	no data	11.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −168%	75−80 +168%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −174%	85−90 +174%
Elden Ring	45−50 −165%	130−140 +165%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −169%	140−150 +169%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −168%	75−80 +168%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −174%	85−90 +174%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −177%	180−190 +177%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −173%	120−130 +173%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −163%	100−105 +163%
Valorant	60−65 −181%	180−190 +181%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −169%	140−150 +169%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −168%	75−80 +168%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −174%	85−90 +174%
Dota 2	55−60 −181%	160−170 +181%
Elden Ring	45−50 −165%	130−140 +165%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −181%	160−170 +181%
Fortnite	85−90 −173%	240−250 +173%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −177%	180−190 +177%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 −181%	160−170 +181%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −173%	120−130 +173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −165%	300−310 +165%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −163%	100−105 +163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −165%	130−140 +165%
Valorant	60−65 −181%	180−190 +181%
World of Tanks	200−210 −172%	550−600 +172%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −169%	140−150 +169%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −168%	75−80 +168%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −174%	85−90 +174%
Dota 2	55−60 −181%	160−170 +181%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −181%	160−170 +181%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −177%	180−190 +177%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −165%	300−310 +165%
Valorant	60−65 −181%	180−190 +181%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	24−27 −171%	65−70 +171%
Elden Ring	24−27 −180%	70−75 +180%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −171%	65−70 +171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −170%	400−450 +170%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
World of Tanks	110−120 −170%	300−310 +170%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −181%	90−95 +181%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −175%	110−120 +175%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −171%	95−100 +171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%
Valorant	40−45 −175%	110−120 +175%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Dota 2	27−30 −168%	75−80 +168%
Elden Ring	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −178%	75−80 +178%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −177%	130−140 +177%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −178%	75−80 +178%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Dota 2	27−30 −168%	75−80 +168%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Fortnite	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Valorant	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%

This is how M4000M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 180% faster in 1080p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 175% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.97	45.35
Recency	18 August 2015	12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 184% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.