NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs GeForce MX130

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce MX130

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
 
Maxwell
Code name
GM204
 
GM108
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Laptop
Release date
18 August 2015
 
17 November 2017

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
384
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
1122 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
1242 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
n/d
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
30 Watt
Texture fill rate
78.00
 
29.81
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
953.9 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
medium sized
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
None

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR5/DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
2 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
40.1 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130.
Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
GPU Boost
n/d
 
+
GameWorks
-
 
+
Optimus
-
 
+
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d
CUDA
-
 
+
GeForce Experience
n/d
 
+

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
12.0 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.6
Vulkan
+
 
-

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
24.91 +133.7%
 
10.66 −133.7%
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
n/d
 
170596
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204 +271.5%
 
13246 −271.5%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937 +217%
 
2188 −217%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723 +232.6%
 
2322 −232.6%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259 +261.9%
 
2835 −261.9%
3DMark Vantage Performance
n/d
 
11968
Unigine Heaven 3.0
n/d
 
28
Passmark
4567 +142%
 
1887 −142%
Octane Render OctaneBench
53
 
n/d

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s
 
n/d

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
0.43 −72.1%
 
0.74 +72.1%
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Far Cry 5 (2018)
low / 720p
n/d
 
27
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
14
high / 1080p
n/d
 
13
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
12
Fortnite (2018)
low / 720p
n/d
 
78
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
32
high / 1080p
n/d
 
24
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
16
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)
low / 720p
n/d
 
32
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
14
high / 1080p
n/d
 
11
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
8
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
30
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
13
high / 1080p
n/d
 
10
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
7
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
33
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
14
high / 1080p
n/d
 
12
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
3
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
56
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
23
high / 1080p
n/d
 
21
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
14
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
80
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
66
high / 1080p
n/d
 
21
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
5
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
44
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
18
high / 1080p
n/d
 
15
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
13
Battlefield 1 (BF1) (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
57
medium / 768p
n/d
 
36
high / 1080p
n/d
 
18
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
16
Far Cry Primal (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
39
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
18
high / 1080p
n/d
 
16
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
12
Overwatch (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
107
medium / 768p
n/d
 
77
high / 1080p
n/d
 
36
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
22
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
low / 768p
n/d
 
48
medium / 768p
90 +208.2%
 
29 −208.2%
high / 1080p
55 +248.1%
 
16 −248.1%
ultra / 1080p
48 +259.6%
 
13 −259.6%
4k / 2160p
20
 
n/d
The Division (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
42
medium / 768p
n/d
 
29
high / 1080p
n/d
 
13
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
10
Titanfall 2 (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
67
medium / 768p
n/d
 
48
high / 1080p
n/d
 
22
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
18
GTA V (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
95
medium / 768p
n/d
 
85
high / 1080p
n/d
 
24
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
10
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
87
medium / 768p
n/d
 
53
high / 1080p
n/d
 
29
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
18
The Witcher 3 (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
43
medium / 768p
n/d
 
25
high / 1080p
n/d
 
14
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
8
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
289
medium / 768p
n/d
 
123
high / 768p
n/d
 
70
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
35
Tomb Raider (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
172
medium / 768p
n/d
 
87
high / 768p
n/d
 
55
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
27
Diablo III (2012)
low / 768p
n/d
 
148
medium / 768p
n/d
 
101
high / 768p
n/d
 
95
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
60
StarCraft 2 (2010)
low / 768p
n/d
 
292
medium / 768p
n/d
 
107
high / 768p
n/d
 
68
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
36

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

133.7% faster (about 2.5 times) in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (256 vs 64 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 40.1 GB/s)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX130

72.1% faster (about 1.5 times) in games
Much newer (17 November 2017 vs 18 August 2015)
More pipelines (384 vs 1)
Less power hungry (30 vs 100 watts)
GPU Boost 2.0 (increases NVIDIA GPU voltage and frequency when there's a temperature headroom. Similar to AMD PowerTune)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
GeForce Experience (software suite built to manage NVIDIA GPU parameters, and to record and stream game video)
GameWorks

So, Quadro M4000M or MX130?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX130 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and GeForce MX130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce MX130
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or GeForce MX130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.