GeForce GT 720M vs Quadro M4000M

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking3061013
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.370.02
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM204N14M-GE
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years old)1 April 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$832 $499
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M4000M has 16750% better value for money than GT 720M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,28096
Core clock speed975 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1013 MHz938 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate78.0012.13
Floating-point performance2,496 gflops240.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 720M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataDDR3
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 2560x1600
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 2560x1600
HDMIno data+
HDCP content protectionno data+
Display Port1.2no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMIno data+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreamingno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Supportno data+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoderno data+
Optimus++
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 API
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA5.2+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M4000M
16.13
+1255%

Quadro M4000M outperforms GeForce GT 720M by 1255% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M4000M 6252
+1250%
GT 720M 463

Quadro M4000M outperforms GeForce GT 720M by 1250% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M4000M 10259
+746%
GT 720M 1213

Quadro M4000M outperforms GeForce GT 720M by 746% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M4000M 7723
+840%
GT 720M 822

Quadro M4000M outperforms GeForce GT 720M by 840% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M4000M 49204
+807%
GT 720M 5426

Quadro M4000M outperforms GeForce GT 720M by 807% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

M4000M 18998
+623%
GT 720M 2627

Quadro M4000M outperforms GeForce GT 720M by 623% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

M4000M 53
+783%
GT 720M 6

Quadro M4000M outperforms GeForce GT 720M by 783% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
+350%
14
−350%
4K20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Hitman 3 45−50
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+750%
4
−750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Hitman 3 45−50
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+580%
5
−580%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Hitman 3 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Battlefield 5 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Hitman 3 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 0−1
Battlefield 5 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 0−1

This is how M4000M and GT 720M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • M4000M is 350% faster than GT 720M

4K resolution:

  • M4000M is 1900% faster than GT 720M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the M4000M is 4400% faster than the GT 720M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, M4000M surpassed GT 720M in all 30 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 16.13 1.19
Recency 2 October 2015 1 April 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 256 64
Memory bandwidth 160 12.8
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1 96
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 33 Watt

The Quadro M4000M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 720M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 720M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GeForce GT 720M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 116 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 802 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.