GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M6-8Q GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-4A GRID M60-8Q Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Tesla M6 Tesla M60
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M4000
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
14.95

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms M4000 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking333288
Place by popularitynot in top-10081
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.81no data
Power efficiency9.8627.63
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM204TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$791 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16641024
Core clock speed773 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate80.3995.04
Floating-point processing power2.573 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs10464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 192 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA5.27.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M4000 14.95
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 17.45
+16.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M4000 6679
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+16.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−26.7%
57
+26.7%
1440p35−40
−25.7%
44
+25.7%
4K18−21
−33.3%
24
+33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p17.58no data
1440p22.60no data
4K43.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 123
+0%
123
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 57
+0%
57
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Fortnite 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 42
+0%
42
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 181
+0%
181
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 69
+0%
69
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Dota 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 180
+0%
180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
+0%
22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 13
+0%
13
+0%

This is how Quadro M4000 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 27% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 26% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 33% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.95 17.45
Recency 29 June 2015 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro M4000 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
RTX A500 RTX A500
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
P106-100 P106 100
RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 Super
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RTX 2070 Super RTX 2070 Super
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RTX 2080 Super RTX 2080 Super
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
Quadro P2200 P2200
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RX 5500M RX 5500M
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RX 6900 XT RX 6900 XT
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RTX 3080 RTX 3080
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RTX 3080 Ti RTX 3080 Ti
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RTX 3090 RTX 3090
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
GeForce MX450 MX450
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 251 vote

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1766 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M4000 or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.