Radeon RX 550 vs Quadro M3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

M3000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
14.29
+103%

Quadro M3000M outperforms Radeon RX 550 by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking342523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.323.16
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Lexa
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years ago)20 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79
Current price$981 $121 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 550 has 36% better value for money than M3000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,024512
Core clock speed1050 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1183 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate67.2037.86
Floating-point performance2,150 gflops1,211 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M3000M and Radeon RX 550 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M3000M 14.29
+103%
RX 550 7.03

Quadro M3000M outperforms Radeon RX 550 by 103% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M3000M 5526
+103%
RX 550 2719

Quadro M3000M outperforms Radeon RX 550 by 103% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

M3000M 16083
+43.6%
RX 550 11200

Quadro M3000M outperforms Radeon RX 550 by 44% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+115%
27−30
−115%
4K23
+130%
10−12
−130%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Hitman 3 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Hitman 3 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+133%
18−20
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+120%
10−11
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Hitman 3 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+133%
6−7
−133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

This is how M3000M and RX 550 compete in popular games:

  • M3000M is 115% faster in 1080p
  • M3000M is 130% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.29 7.03
Recency 2 October 2015 20 April 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

The Quadro M3000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M3000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 550 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Quadro M3000M
AMD Radeon RX 550
Radeon RX 550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 296 votes

Rate Quadro M3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5692 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.