K5100M vs M2200

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Quadro M2200
11.06
+39.3%

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 39% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking388481
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.061.50
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN17P-Q3N15E-Q5-A2
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date13 January 2017 (7 years old)23 July 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$1967 $440
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

K5100M has 42% better value for money than Quadro M2200.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241536
Core clock speed694 MHz771 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors1870 Million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate66.3098.69
Floating-point performanceno data2,369 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro M2200 and Quadro K5100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5508 MHz3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.21.2

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Vision Prono data+
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic++
nView Display Management++
Optimus++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212
Shader Model5.05
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA5.2+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.06
+39.3%
K5100M 7.94

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 39% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M2200 4285
+39.3%
K5100M 3077

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 39% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M2200 24622
K5100M 24795
+0.7%

K5100M outperforms M2200 by 1% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M2200 7372
+7.2%
K5100M 6880

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 7% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M2200 5850
+22.1%
K5100M 4793

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 22% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M2200 37796
+21.9%
K5100M 31015

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 22% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro M2200 13006
+12.7%
K5100M 11544

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 13% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Quadro M2200 289176
+13062%
K5100M 2197

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 13062% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 47
+5.6%
K5100M 44

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 6% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 86
+41.5%
K5100M 61

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 42% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 58
K5100M 71
+22.4%

K5100M outperforms M2200 by 22% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 72
+22.4%
K5100M 59

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 22% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 69
+58.9%
K5100M 43

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 59% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 25
+36.7%
K5100M 18

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 37% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 33
+19.7%
K5100M 27

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 20% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 5
+136%
K5100M 2

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 136% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro M2200 33
+19.7%
K5100M 27

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 20% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro M2200 47
+5.6%
K5100M 44

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 6% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro M2200 72
+22.4%
K5100M 59

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 22% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro M2200 86
+41.5%
K5100M 61

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 42% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro M2200 58
K5100M 71
+22.4%

K5100M outperforms M2200 by 22% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro M2200 69
+58.9%
K5100M 43

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 59% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro M2200 25
+36.7%
K5100M 18

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 37% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro M2200 5.2
+136%
K5100M 2.2

M2200 outperforms K5100M by 136% in SPECviewperf 12 - Energy.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
−13.3%
51
+13.3%
4K14
−114%
30
+114%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+46.2%
24−27
−46.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
+45%
20−22
−45%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+46.2%
24−27
−46.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
+45%
20−22
−45%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+48%
25
−48%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+46.2%
24−27
−46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+42.9%
14
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+30%
10
−30%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how Quadro M2200 and K5100M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • K5100M is 13.3% faster than Quadro M2200

4K resolution:

  • K5100M is 114% faster than Quadro M2200

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro M2200 is 133% faster than the K5100M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro M2200 is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 11.06 7.94
Recency 13 January 2017 23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 100 Watt

The Quadro M2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5100M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Quadro K5100M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 264 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 44 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro K5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.