GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh vs Quadro M2000M

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	449	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	2.38	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GM107	TU106B
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$363	no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1920
Core clock speed	1038 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1197 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.92	187.2
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro M2000M and GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	11 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	264.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	5.0	7.5

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Recency	2 October 2015	29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---