Quadro RTX A6000 vs M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000 and Quadro RTX A6000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro M2000
2016
4 GB 128-bit, 75 Watt
10.31

RTX A6000 outperforms Quadro M2000 by a whopping 302% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking40784
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.290.49
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGM206Ampere
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date8 April 2016 (8 years ago)5 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$437.75 $4,649
Current price$285 (0.7x MSRP)$8932 (1.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M2000 has 776% better value for money than RTX A6000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76810752
Core clock speed796 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1163 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate55.82625.0
Floating-point performance1,812 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length201 mm267 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed6612 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 106 GB/s768.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP DP DP DP4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model56.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA5.28.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−318%
167
+318%
1440p30−35
−330%
129
+330%
4K27−30
−315%
112
+315%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−276%
500−550
+276%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−293%
350−400
+293%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−292%
400−450
+292%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−287%
600−650
+287%
Hitman 3 85−90
−253%
300−310
+253%
Horizon Zero Dawn 248
−283%
950−1000
+283%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−288%
450−500
+288%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−257%
350−400
+257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300
−300%
1200−1250
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
−300%
400−450
+300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−276%
500−550
+276%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−293%
350−400
+293%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−292%
400−450
+292%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−287%
600−650
+287%
Hitman 3 85−90
−253%
300−310
+253%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−285%
650−700
+285%
Metro Exodus 34
−282%
130−140
+282%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−257%
350−400
+257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 293
−292%
1150−1200
+292%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 307
−291%
1200−1250
+291%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
−300%
400−450
+300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−293%
350−400
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−287%
600−650
+287%
Horizon Zero Dawn 224
−302%
900−950
+302%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 288
−299%
1150−1200
+299%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180
−289%
700−750
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
−300%
400−450
+300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−257%
350−400
+257%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−270%
300−310
+270%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−261%
350−400
+261%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−300%
180−190
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−291%
180−190
+291%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−291%
250−260
+291%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
Far Cry 5 52
−285%
200−210
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−302%
350−400
+302%
Hitman 3 50−55
−289%
210−220
+289%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210
−281%
800−850
+281%
Metro Exodus 63
−297%
250−260
+297%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 247
−285%
950−1000
+285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−287%
240−250
+287%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−281%
160−170
+281%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
Hitman 3 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−296%
210−220
+296%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−294%
130−140
+294%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
−277%
550−600
+277%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−297%
230−240
+297%
Horizon Zero Dawn 137
−301%
550−600
+301%
Metro Exodus 63
−297%
250−260
+297%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−278%
140−150
+278%

This is how Quadro M2000 and RTX A6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is 318% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A6000 is 330% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A6000 is 315% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.31 41.48
Recency 8 April 2016 5 October 2020
Cost $437.75 $4649
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 195 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 450 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.