GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs Quadro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000 with GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2000
2016
4 GB 128-bit, 75 Watt
10.35

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms M2000 by a whopping 760% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4395
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.6438.32
Power efficiency9.4819.10
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM206AD103
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 April 2016 (8 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$437.75 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4080 SUPER has 953% better value for money than Quadro M2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76810240
Core clock speed796 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed1163 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate55.82816.0
Floating-point processing power1.786 TFLOPS52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs48320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length201 mm310 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1438 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 106 GB/s736.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.28.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2000 10.35
RTX 4080 SUPER 88.98
+760%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M2000 3985
RTX 4080 SUPER 34273
+760%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−770%
261
+770%
1440p21−24
−762%
181
+762%
4K12−14
−875%
117
+875%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.593.83
1440p20.855.52
4K36.488.54

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 235
+0%
235
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 281
+0%
281
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 342
+0%
342
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 237
+0%
237
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 568
+0%
568
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 158
+0%
158
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 209
+0%
209
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 322
+0%
322
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 425
+0%
425
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 527
+0%
527
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 263
+0%
263
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 145
+0%
145
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 135
+0%
135
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 165
+0%
165
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 345
+0%
345
+0%
Metro Exodus 171
+0%
171
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 397
+0%
397
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 221
+0%
221
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+0%
204
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 96
+0%
96
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 99
+0%
99
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 305
+0%
305
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 201
+0%
201
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 81
+0%
81
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

This is how Quadro M2000 and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 770% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 762% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 875% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.35 88.98
Recency 8 April 2016 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 320 Watt

Quadro M2000 has 326.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 759.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8
210 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1
2038 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.