Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro M1000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M1000M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

M1000M
2015
2 GB/4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
7.40
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.27
+269%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms M1000M by a whopping 269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking531200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.00no data
Power efficiency12.8954.31
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM107AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed993 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1072 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate31.78129.6
Floating-point processing power1.017 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB/4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.08.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.40
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.27
+269%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M1000M 4230
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+379%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M1000M 3498
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+304%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
−259%
140−150
+259%
4K13
−246%
45−50
+246%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.15no data
4K15.45no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−268%
70−75
+268%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−264%
80−85
+264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%
Hitman 3 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−249%
150−160
+249%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−268%
70−75
+268%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−264%
80−85
+264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%
Hitman 3 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−249%
150−160
+249%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−255%
220−230
+255%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−268%
70−75
+268%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%
Hitman 3 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−249%
150−160
+249%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−264%
40−45
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
Hitman 3 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−262%
170−180
+262%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Hitman 3 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−243%
24−27
+243%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%

This is how M1000M and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 259% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 246% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.40 27.27
Recency 18 August 2015 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB/4 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 268.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 540 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.