Radeon RX 9070 vs Quadro K620M

Quadro K100M Quadro K200M Quadro K500M Quadro K510M Quadro K610M Quadro K620M
VS
Radeon RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 9060 XT Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K620M with Radeon RX 9070, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K620M
2015
2 GB DDR3, 30 Watt
2.91

RX 9070 outperforms K620M by a whopping 2016% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K620M Quadro K620M
RX 9070 RX 9070

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking79536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data61.67
Power efficiency6.8619.80
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGM108Navi 48
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2015 (10 years ago)6 March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584
Core clock speed1029 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98564.5
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS36.13 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16224
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K620M 2.91
RX 9070 61.59
+2016%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K620M 1163
RX 9070 24623
+2017%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−814%
201
+814%
1440p5−6
−2340%
122
+2340%
4K3−4
−2433%
76
+2433%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.73
1440pno data4.50
4Kno data7.22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−3638%
290−300
+3638%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2333%
140−150
+2333%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3671%
264
+3671%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1560%
160−170
+1560%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−3638%
290−300
+3638%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2333%
140−150
+2333%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−4086%
293
+4086%
Fortnite 14−16
−1727%
270−280
+1727%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1543%
230−240
+1543%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−3380%
170−180
+3380%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3200%
231
+3200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1254%
170−180
+1254%
Valorant 45−50
−609%
300−350
+609%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1560%
160−170
+1560%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−3638%
290−300
+3638%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−415%
270−280
+415%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2333%
140−150
+2333%
Dota 2 27−30
−1864%
550−600
+1864%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−3957%
284
+3957%
Fortnite 14−16
−1727%
270−280
+1727%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1543%
230−240
+1543%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−3380%
170−180
+3380%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−1925%
160−170
+1925%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−2471%
180
+2471%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2880%
140−150
+2880%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1254%
170−180
+1254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−4330%
443
+4330%
Valorant 45−50
−609%
300−350
+609%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1560%
160−170
+1560%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2333%
140−150
+2333%
Dota 2 27−30
−1864%
550−600
+1864%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−3743%
269
+3743%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1543%
230−240
+1543%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−1800%
133
+1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1254%
170−180
+1254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2400%
250
+2400%
Valorant 45−50
−609%
300−350
+609%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−1727%
270−280
+1727%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1990%
400−450
+1990%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−6150%
120−130
+6150%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−733%
170−180
+733%
Valorant 27−30
−1307%
350−400
+1307%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3950%
80−85
+3950%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−3386%
244
+3386%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2657%
190−200
+2657%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−3400%
105
+3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−4675%
191
+4675%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−2920%
150−160
+2920%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−794%
140−150
+794%
Valorant 14−16
−2207%
300−350
+2207%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Dota 2 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2580%
134
+2580%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7050%
140−150
+7050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−2300%
95−100
+2300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 166
+0%
166
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 61
+0%
61
+0%

This is how Quadro K620M and RX 9070 compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 is 814% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 is 2340% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9070 is 2433% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 9070 is 9600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 9070 is ahead in 55 tests (87%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.91 61.59
Recency 1 March 2015 6 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 220 Watt

Quadro K620M has 633.3% lower power consumption.

RX 9070, on the other hand, has a 2016.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K620M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 9070 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K620M
Quadro K620M
AMD Radeon RX 9070
Radeon RX 9070
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K620M Quadro K620M
vs
Quadro M500M Quadro M500M
RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070
vs
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
Quadro K620M Quadro K620M
vs
W4190M FirePro W4190M
R7 M370 R7 M370
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
Quadro M600M M600M
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
Quadro M600M M600M
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
Quadro M600M M600M
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
Quadro K620M K620M
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
Quadro K620M K620M
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
R7 (Bristol Ridge) R7 (Bristol Ridge)
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
R7 (Bristol Ridge) R7 (Bristol Ridge)
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
R7 (Bristol Ridge) R7 (Bristol Ridge)
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
GeForce 930M 930M
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro K620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 273 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K620M or Radeon RX 9070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.