RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Quadro K620M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K620M with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K620M
2015
2 GB DDR3, 30 Watt
3.03

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms K620M by a whopping 1395% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking78478
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data88.92
Power efficiency6.9444.49
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM108AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842816
Core clock speed1029 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98187.4
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1688
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K620M 3.03
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.30
+1395%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K620M 1167
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17453
+1396%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro K620M 5974
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 86224
+1343%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−1264%
300−350
+1264%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.16

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Atomic Heart 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Fortnite 14−16
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1329%
200−210
+1329%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1362%
190−200
+1362%
Valorant 45−50
−1313%
650−700
+1313%
Atomic Heart 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−1381%
800−850
+1381%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Dota 2 27−30
−1329%
400−450
+1329%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Fortnite 14−16
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1329%
200−210
+1329%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1362%
190−200
+1362%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Valorant 45−50
−1313%
650−700
+1313%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Dota 2 27−30
−1329%
400−450
+1329%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1329%
200−210
+1329%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1362%
190−200
+1362%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Valorant 45−50
−1313%
650−700
+1313%
Fortnite 14−16
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1329%
300−310
+1329%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Valorant 27−30
−1381%
400−450
+1381%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Fortnite 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1338%
230−240
+1338%
Valorant 14−16
−1329%
200−210
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Fortnite 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

This is how Quadro K620M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 1264% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.03 45.30
Recency 1 March 2015 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 70 Watt

Quadro K620M has 133.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 1395% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K620M is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K620M
Quadro K620M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
5 votes

Rate Quadro K620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1
29 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K620M or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.