GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 vs Quadro K620M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking846not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.10no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGM108Crush11
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2015 (10 years ago)4 June 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1029 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.980.7
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs164
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX127.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2015 4 June 2001
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

Quadro K620M has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K620M and GeForce2 MX + nForce 220. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K620M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K620M
Quadro K620M
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220
GeForce2 MX + nForce 220

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Quadro K620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K620M or GeForce2 MX + nForce 220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.