ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs GeForce GT 650M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	832	1599
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.85	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	GK107	RV280
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	22 March 2012 (13 years ago)	1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	Up to 900 MHz	250 MHz
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,270 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	30.40	1.000
Floating-point processing power	0.7296 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	32	4
L1 Cache	32 KB	no data
L2 Cache	256 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3\GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	128bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 80.0 GB/s	6.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	-
Optimus	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	8.1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	1.4
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	31	no data
Full HD	32	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	22 March 2012	1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	28 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---