GeForce GT 630 vs Quadro K620M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K620M with GeForce GT 630, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K620M
2015
2 GB DDR3, 30 Watt
3.00
+72.4%

K620M outperforms GT 630 by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking783934
Place by popularitynot in top-10079
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.08
Power efficiency6.971.87
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM108GF108
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed1029 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate17.9812.96
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS0.311 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K620M 3.00
+72.4%
GT 630 1.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K620M 1167
+72.6%
GT 630 676

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro K620M 1621
+100%
GT 630 810

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro K620M 4583
+87%
GT 630 2451

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Fortnite 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Valorant 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Fortnite 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Valorant 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Valorant 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

This is how Quadro K620M and GT 630 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K620M is 83% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.00 1.74
Recency 1 March 2015 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 65 Watt

Quadro K620M has a 72.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 116.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K620M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K620M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 630 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K620M
Quadro K620M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GeForce GT 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro K620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 2827 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K620M or GeForce GT 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.