Arc B570 vs Quadro K620M

Place in the ranking	777	118
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	100.00
Power efficiency	6.94	17.83
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Xe2 (2025)
GPU code name	GM108	BMG-G21
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 March 2015 (9 years ago)	16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2304
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	2500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.98	360.0
Floating-point processing power	0.8632 TFLOPS	11.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	80
TMUs	16	144
Tensor Cores	no data	144
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	10 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	380.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.4
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K620M 3.03

Arc B570 38.90
+1184%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K620M 1165

Arc B570 14953
+1184%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1138%

260−270
+1138%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

0.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1114%	85−90 +1114%
Elden Ring	7−8 −1114%	85−90 +1114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1150%	100−105 +1150%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1114%	85−90 +1114%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1114%	170−180 +1114%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1150%	75−80 +1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −1173%	140−150 +1173%
Valorant	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1150%	100−105 +1150%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1114%	85−90 +1114%
Dota 2	8−9 −1150%	100−105 +1150%
Elden Ring	7−8 −1114%	85−90 +1114%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −1135%	210−220 +1135%
Fortnite	16−18 −1135%	210−220 +1135%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1114%	170−180 +1114%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −1150%	100−105 +1150%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1150%	75−80 +1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −1150%	350−400 +1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −1173%	140−150 +1173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1173%	140−150 +1173%
Valorant	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
World of Tanks	50−55 −1104%	650−700 +1104%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1150%	100−105 +1150%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1114%	85−90 +1114%
Dota 2	8−9 −1150%	100−105 +1150%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −1135%	210−220 +1135%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1114%	170−180 +1114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −1150%	350−400 +1150%
Valorant	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Elden Ring	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −1173%	280−290 +1173%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
World of Tanks	21−24 −1138%	260−270 +1138%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −1150%	400−450 +1150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1114%	85−90 +1114%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1150%	75−80 +1150%
Valorant	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1150%	200−210 +1150%
Elden Ring	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1167%	190−200 +1167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1150%	100−105 +1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1150%	200−210 +1150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Dota 2	16−18 −1150%	200−210 +1150%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Fortnite	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Valorant	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%

This is how Quadro K620M and Arc B570 compete in popular games:

Arc B570 is 1138% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.03	38.90
Recency	1 March 2015	16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	10 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	150 Watt

Quadro K620M has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc B570, on the other hand, has a 1183.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K620M is a mobile workstation card while Arc B570 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.