Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000 K40d K40m K40s K40st K40t
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7600 7600 XT 7650 GRE 7700 XT 7800 XT 7900 GRE 7900 XT 7900 XTX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K5200
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
14.44

RX 7800 XT outperforms K5200 by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
RX 7800 XT RX 7800 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking37541
Place by popularitynot in top-10071
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.9468.74
Power efficiency7.3916.62
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGK110BNavi 32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 7800 XT has 7213% better value for money than Quadro K5200.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043840
Core clock speed667 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate148.0583.2
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs192240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA3.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K5200 14.44
RX 7800 XT 56.94
+294%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K5200 6145
RX 7800 XT 24227
+294%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−328%
214
+328%
1440p30−35
−310%
123
+310%
4K18−20
−300%
72
+300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p33.99
−1358%
2.33
+1358%
1440p56.66
−1297%
4.06
+1297%
4K94.43
−1263%
6.93
+1263%
  • RX 7800 XT has 1358% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT has 1297% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT has 1263% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 351
+0%
351
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 248
+0%
248
+0%
Sons of the Forest 132
+0%
132
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 355
+0%
355
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 196
+0%
196
+0%
Far Cry 5 204
+0%
204
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 278
+0%
278
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 276
+0%
276
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Sons of the Forest 127
+0%
127
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 283
+0%
283
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 163
+0%
163
+0%
Far Cry 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 261
+0%
261
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 256
+0%
256
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 178
+0%
178
+0%
Metro Exodus 172
+0%
172
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Sons of the Forest 123
+0%
123
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 366
+0%
366
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150
+0%
150
+0%
Far Cry 5 182
+0%
182
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+0%
222
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Sons of the Forest 122
+0%
122
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200
+0%
200
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 175
+0%
175
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140
+0%
140
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 176
+0%
176
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+0%
202
+0%
Sons of the Forest 113
+0%
113
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+0%
147
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 63
+0%
63
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 164
+0%
164
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Sons of the Forest 70
+0%
70
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Quadro K5200 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 328% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 310% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 300% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.44 56.94
Recency 22 July 2014 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 263 Watt

Quadro K5200 has 75.3% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 294.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
vs
RX 9060 XT 16GB Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
vs
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
vs
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
RTX 2060 Super GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510
vs
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
vs
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
vs
GRID K540Q GRID K540Q
Graphics Radeon Graphics
vs
GRID K180Q GRID K180Q
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 49 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4535 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5200 or Radeon RX 7800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.