Radeon R7 350 vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 with Radeon R7 350, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K5200
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
15.87
+184%

K5200 outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking341603
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.21no data
Power efficiency7.256.96
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGK110BCape Verde
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)6 July 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304512
Core clock speed667 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate148.025.60
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs19232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.87 5.59
Recency 22 July 2014 6 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 55 Watt

Quadro K5200 has a 183.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

R7 350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 172.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 42 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 485 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.