Tesla K40t vs Radeon R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking668not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.15no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGK110B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 July 2016 (9 years ago)22 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122880
Core clock speed800 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speedno data876 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate25.60210.2
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS5.046 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs32240
L1 Cache128 KB240 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 July 2016 22 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 245 Watt

R7 350 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 345.5% lower power consumption.

Tesla K40t, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 350 and Tesla K40t. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K40t is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA Tesla K40t
Tesla K40t

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 562 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla K40t on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or Tesla K40t, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.