Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000 Tesla K40m Tesla K40st
VS
Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 with Quadro T2000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K5200
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
15.82

T2000 Max-Q outperforms K5200 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking344310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.26no data
Power efficiency7.2630.91
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK110BTU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed667 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate148.0103.7
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs19264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K5200 15.82
T2000 Max-Q 17.96
+13.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K5200 6083
T2000 Max-Q 6903
+13.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−14%
57
+14%
1440p21−24
−23.8%
26
+23.8%
4K30−35
−23.3%
37
+23.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p33.99no data
1440p80.94no data
4K56.66no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Elden Ring 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 64
+0%
64
+0%
Valorant 86
+0%
86
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
Elden Ring 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 40
+0%
40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 45
+0%
45
+0%
World of Tanks 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how Quadro K5200 and T2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Max-Q is 14% faster in 1080p
  • T2000 Max-Q is 24% faster in 1440p
  • T2000 Max-Q is 23% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.82 17.96
Recency 22 July 2014 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 40 Watt

Quadro K5200 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 13.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation card while Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
FirePro W9000 FirePro W9000
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XT
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU M2 Max 30-Core GPU
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
Quadro K620M Quadro K620M
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
vs
Tesla V100 FHHL Tesla V100 FHHL
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
vs
H100 SXM5 H100 SXM5
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
vs
H100 CNX H100 CNX
Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
vs
GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 42 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 75 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.