FirePro S7150 vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 and FirePro S7150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro K5200
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
13.99
+64%

K5200 outperforms S7150 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking381506
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.920.24
Power efficiency7.514.58
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK110BTonga
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)1 February 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 $2,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Quadro K5200 has 283% better value for money than FirePro S7150.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
Core clock speed667 MHz920 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate148.0117.8
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS3.768 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs192128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.5-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K5200 13.99
+64%
FirePro S7150 8.53

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K5200 Samples: 369 6187
+64.1%
FirePro S7150 Samples: 7 3770

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro K5200 19141
FirePro S7150 27128
+41.7%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro K5200 20139
FirePro S7150 29690
+47.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.99 8.53
Recency 22 July 2014 1 February 2016

Quadro K5200 has a 64% higher aggregate performance score.

FirePro S7150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Quadro K5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S7150 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
AMD FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 51 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 9 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5200 or FirePro S7150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.