GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro K5100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

K5100M
2013
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
7.94

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro K5100M by a whopping 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking486257
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.5618.31
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN15E-Q5-A2N18P-G62
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (10 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$440 $892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 1074% better value for money than K5100M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361024
Core clock speed771 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate98.6995.04
Floating-point performance2,369 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K5100M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model56.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K5100M 7.94
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.17
+154%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro K5100M by 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K5100M 3071
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+154%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro K5100M by 154% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

K5100M 6880
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+92.8%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro K5100M by 93% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

K5100M 24795
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+75.5%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro K5100M by 76% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

K5100M 4793
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+107%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro K5100M by 107% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

K5100M 31015
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
+110%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro K5100M by 110% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

K5100M 2197
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191
+18571%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro K5100M by 18571% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
−20.8%
58
+20.8%
1440p16−18
−175%
44
+175%
4K27
+0%
27
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−392%
59
+392%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−281%
61
+281%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−345%
49
+345%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−175%
65−70
+175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−212%
53
+212%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−283%
46
+283%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−188%
69
+188%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−300%
84
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−136%
65−70
+136%
Hitman 3 18−20
−361%
83
+361%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−311%
115
+311%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−314%
91
+314%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−100%
44
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−313%
95
+313%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−362%
60
+362%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−188%
46
+188%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−191%
32
+191%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−175%
65−70
+175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−276%
64
+276%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−200%
36
+200%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−192%
70
+192%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−181%
59
+181%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−136%
65−70
+136%
Hitman 3 18−20
−150%
45
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−225%
91
+225%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−182%
62
+182%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−90.9%
42
+90.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−170%
62
+170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−188%
72
+188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−300%
52
+300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−68.8%
27
+68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−36.4%
15
+36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−82.4%
31
+82.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−183%
34
+183%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−62.5%
39
+62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−136%
65−70
+136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−129%
64
+129%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−159%
57
+159%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−179%
39
+179%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−69.2%
22
+69.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−86.4%
41
+86.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27
+170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−240%
17
+240%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16
+300%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−183%
30−35
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−179%
35−40
+179%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−141%
40−45
+141%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−280%
35−40
+280%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 20−22
−130%
46
+130%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−267%
21−24
+267%
Hitman 3 4−5
−300%
16
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−150%
25
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−460%
28
+460%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−211%
27−30
+211%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

This is how K5100M and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 21% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 175% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 533% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1650 Ti Mobile surpassed K5100M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.94 20.17
Recency 23 July 2013 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5100M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Quadro K5100M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 47 votes

Rate Quadro K5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1450 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.