RTX A2000 vs Quadro K4100M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

K4100M
2013
4GB GDDR5
7.07

RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K4100M by a whopping 404% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking516133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.6518.84
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN15E-Q3-A2GA106
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (10 years ago)10 August 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $449
Current price$323 (0.2x MSRP)$567 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A2000 has 1042% better value for money than K4100M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11523328
Core clock speed706 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate67.78124.8
Floating-point performance1,627 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K4100M and RTX A2000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed3200 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model56.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K4100M 7.07
RTX A2000 35.61
+404%

RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K4100M by 404% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K4100M 2735
RTX A2000 13777
+404%

RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K4100M by 404% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

K4100M 9097
RTX A2000 73239
+705%

RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K4100M by 705% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

K4100M 7058
RTX A2000 69533
+885%

RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K4100M by 885% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

K4100M 6821
RTX A2000 84002
+1132%

RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K4100M by 1132% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
−400%
240−250
+400%
4K13
−400%
65−70
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−400%
85−90
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Hitman 3 16−18
−400%
85−90
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−400%
85−90
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Hitman 3 16−18
−400%
85−90
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−400%
85−90
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Hitman 3 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Hitman 3 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

This is how K4100M and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 400% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 is 400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.07 35.61
Recency 23 July 2013 10 August 2021
Cost $1499 $449
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4100M is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 75 votes

Rate Quadro K4100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 507 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.