FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K4100M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

K4100M
2013
4GB GDDR5
7.07

FirePro W4300 outperforms Quadro K4100M by a small 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking516497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.644.63
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameN15E-Q3-A2Bonaire
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (10 years ago)1 December 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data
Current price$323 (0.2x MSRP)$129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W4300 has 182% better value for money than K4100M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152768
Core clock speed706 MHz930 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate67.7844.64
Floating-point performance1,627 gflops1,428 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K4100M and FirePro W4300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data171 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3200 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model56.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K4100M 7.07
FirePro W4300 7.48
+5.8%

FirePro W4300 outperforms Quadro K4100M by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K4100M 2735
FirePro W4300 2894
+5.8%

FirePro W4300 outperforms Quadro K4100M by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
4K13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how K4100M and FirePro W4300 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W4300 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • K4100M is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.07 7.48
Recency 23 July 2013 1 December 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro K4100M and FirePro W4300.

Be aware that Quadro K4100M is a mobile workstation card while FirePro W4300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Quadro K4100M
AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 75 votes

Rate Quadro K4100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 16 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.