Radeon RX 590 vs Quadro K4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K1200 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D Quadro K2200 Quadro K4000 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 SYNC Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000 SDI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 550 Radeon RX 550X Radeon RX 560 Radeon RX 560 XT Radeon RX 560X Radeon RX 570 Radeon RX 570X Radeon RX 580 Radeon RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580X Radeon RX 590 Radeon RX 590 GME

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4000 with Radeon RX 590, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4000
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
6.92

RX 590 outperforms K4000 by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
RX 590 RX 590

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking559237
Place by popularitynot in top-100100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.6224.01
Power efficiency6.079.57
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Polaris 30
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)15 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,269 $279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 590 has 3773% better value for money than Quadro K4000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682304
Core clock speed810 MHz1469 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate51.84222.5
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS7.119 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs64144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1404 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth134.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K4000 6.92
RX 590 23.84
+245%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K4000 2722
RX 590 9382
+245%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−250%
105
+250%
1440p18−20
−256%
64
+256%
4K10−12
−290%
39
+290%

Cost per frame, $

1080p42.30
−1492%
2.66
+1492%
1440p70.50
−1517%
4.36
+1517%
4K126.90
−1674%
7.15
+1674%
  • RX 590 has 1492% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 590 has 1517% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 590 has 1674% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Fortnite 139
+0%
139
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+0%
120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120
+0%
120
+0%
Valorant 301
+0%
301
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 138
+0%
138
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 113
+0%
113
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 52
+0%
52
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 108
+0%
108
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+0%
88
+0%
Valorant 287
+0%
287
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 83
+0%
83
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 110
+0%
110
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 96
+0%
96
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 232
+0%
232
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+0%
32
+0%
Valorant 113
+0%
113
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+0%
46
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35
+0%
35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 29
+0%
29
+0%

This is how Quadro K4000 and RX 590 compete in popular games:

  • RX 590 is 250% faster in 1080p
  • RX 590 is 256% faster in 1440p
  • RX 590 is 290% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.92 23.84
Recency 1 March 2013 15 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 175 Watt

Quadro K4000 has 118.8% lower power consumption.

RX 590, on the other hand, has a 244.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 590 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 590 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Quadro K4000
AMD Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
GRID K2 GRID K2
RX 590 Radeon RX 590
vs
R9 390X Radeon R9 390X
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
vs
E6760 MXM Radeon E6760 MXM
HD Graphics 615 HD Graphics 615
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
P106M P106M
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
RTX 4090 Ti GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
vs
9400 GT GeForce 9400 GT
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
GT 630 GeForce GT 630
Millennium G200
vs
Tesla K40s Tesla K40s
RX 6800 Radeon RX 6800
vs
GeForce 6800 GeForce 6800
HD 8730M Radeon HD 8730M
vs
GTX 950M GeForce GTX 950M
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
vs
Radeon VII Radeon VII
RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107
vs
GT 140 OEM GeForce GT 140 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 199 votes

Rate Quadro K4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2600 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4000 or Radeon RX 590, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.