NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro K2200
NVIDIA Tesla C2050

General info

Comparison of Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
17.74
 
n/d
Architecture
Maxwell
 
Fermi
Code name
GM107
 
GF100
Type
Workstation
 
Workstation
Release date
22 July 2014
 
25 July 2011
Launch price (MSRP)
$395.75
 
n/d
Price now
$350
 
n/d

Technical specs

Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
640
 
448
Core clock speed
1046 MHz
 
575 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
 
n/d
Transistor count
1,870 million
 
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
 
238 Watt
Texture fill rate
44.96 GTexel / s
 
32.2 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance
1,439 gflops
 
1,030.4 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
 
PCIe 2.0 x16
Length
202 mm
 
248 mm
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
3 GB
Memory bus width
128 Bit
 
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.19 GB / s
 
144.0 GB / s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050.
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
 
1x DVI

API support

APIs supported by Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12.0 (11_0)
 
12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
 
4.6
Vulkan
+
 
-

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

K2200 18.64
Tesla C2050 18.71 +0.4%

Octane Render OctaneBench

K2200 31
Tesla C2050 39 +25.8%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
162 Mh/s +80%
 
90 Mh/s −80%
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.6 Mh/s
 
n/d

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Much newer (22 July 2014 vs 25 July 2011)
More pipelines (640 vs 448)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
Less power hungry (68 vs 238 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla C2050

0.4% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (384 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (144 vs 80.19 GB/s)

So, Quadro K2200 or Tesla C2050?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Like
Like

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro K2200 or Tesla C2050, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.