NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs Tesla C2050
Comparison of Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
44.96 GTexel / s
32.2 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
80.19 GB / s
144.0 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050.
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
APIs supported by Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Tesla C2050 18.71 +0.4%
Octane Render OctaneBench
Tesla C2050 39 +25.8%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
162 Mh/s +80%
90 Mh/s −80%
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
Let's see how good Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Much newer (22 July 2014 vs 25 July 2011)
More pipelines (640 vs 448)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
Less power hungry (68 vs 238 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla C2050
0.4% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (384 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (144 vs 80.19 GB/s)
So, Quadro K2200 or Tesla C2050?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2050, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.